Taxes 6 min read

Three tax planning moves that compound over decades.

Most tax conversations happen in March and April. The ones worth having happen in October, when there is still time to do something about it.

When most people think about tax planning, they think about April. About the rush to find receipts, the conversation with the CPA, the moment of either relief or quiet alarm. April is when taxes get reported. It is not, generally, when they get reduced.

The work that actually reduces a lifetime tax bill happens in the months when no one is thinking about it. The structural decisions, the timing choices, the long arc moves that compound year after year and produce outcomes a typical filer never sees. Three of those moves do more work than the rest combined. They are not exotic. None of them requires unusual circumstances. All of them require the willingness to think about taxes before they are due.

One: Roth conversions in the years between

The single most consequential tax planning window in most retirement plans is the period between when earned income stops and when required minimum distributions begin. For many clients, that is the years between roughly age sixty-three and seventy-three. For ten years, taxable income drops, sometimes dramatically, before mandated distributions push it back up.

The opportunity in those years is to move money from a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA at a lower tax rate than the client paid when contributing and lower than the rate they will face once required distributions begin. The principal is taxed once on the way over. After that, it grows tax-free forever, including for the beneficiaries who eventually inherit it.

The chart below compares two versions of the same retirement. Both clients have the same starting balance, the same Social Security benefit, the same spending. The only difference is whether they convert. The numbers shown are total federal taxes paid over a thirty-year retirement.

Lifetime federal taxes paid over a 30-year retirement

$487K Without conversions Large RMDs push into higher brackets $326K With conversions, ages 64-72 Conversion tax paid early at lower rates SAVINGS $161K
Hypothetical comparison for a married couple with $1.5M in traditional IRA assets at age 64. The conversion strategy moves $200,000 from traditional to Roth across nine “gap years” before RMDs begin, paying tax at the 22% bracket. Numbers depend on starting balances, Social Security timing, state taxes, and bracket placement. For illustration only. We do not provide tax advice.

The total tax savings across a thirty-year retirement, in scenarios we have modeled, often range from sixty thousand to two hundred thousand dollars depending on portfolio size, state of residence, and exact bracket placement. Done correctly, the strategy also reduces taxable Social Security, reduces Medicare premium surcharges, and leaves heirs an asset that compounds tax-free for another decade after inheritance under current rules.

Two: Tax-loss harvesting that actually matters

Tax-loss harvesting is one of those phrases that gets used a lot and practiced badly. Done well, it can reduce a client’s lifetime tax bill by tens of thousands of dollars. Done poorly, it produces no benefit at all and sometimes locks in losses for no reason.

The principle is straightforward. When a holding in a taxable account is at a loss, the loss can be realized to offset capital gains elsewhere, or up to three thousand dollars of ordinary income. The proceeds are reinvested in a similar but not identical security, preserving market exposure. The cost basis on the new position is lower, which means future gains will be taxed on a smaller base. The benefit is real, but it accrues over years.

What separates effective harvesting from busywork is three things:

  • Threshold discipline. Realizing a small loss creates a transaction cost with no meaningful tax benefit. We generally harvest losses above a meaningful dollar threshold, not every two percent dip.
  • Replacement strategy. The IRS wash sale rule prevents repurchasing the same security within thirty days. The right approach is to identify a substitute that is highly correlated but not “substantially identical,” so market exposure is preserved while the loss is captured.
  • Carry-forward management. Losses that exceed gains in a given year carry forward indefinitely. For some clients, building a bank of carried losses is itself a strategy, particularly ahead of a planned business sale or large concentrated position liquidation.

The biggest opportunities tend to occur during the kinds of market drawdowns we wrote about in our piece on volatility. A twenty percent decline that the long-term investor should not react to with their portfolio is often the right moment to harvest the loss across positions that have unrealized losses, while staying invested. The decline becomes useful.

Three: Asset location

Asset allocation gets discussed constantly. Asset location, the related discipline of which investments belong in which type of account, gets discussed almost never. It is one of the most consistent sources of after-tax outperformance available, and it requires no change in investment strategy. It requires only deciding where to hold what.

The principle is that different account types have different tax treatments, and different investments have different tax efficiencies. Pairing them correctly can add roughly twenty to seventy-five basis points of after-tax return per year over decades, which is meaningful.

Account type Best suited for Why
Taxable brokerage Broad equity index funds, municipal bonds Long-term capital gains are taxed at preferential rates. Municipals are federally tax-exempt.
Traditional IRA / 401(k) Taxable bonds, REITs, high-turnover funds Ordinary income and high distributions are deferred until withdrawal.
Roth IRA / Roth 401(k) Highest-growth-expectation equities All future growth is tax-free, so the highest expected return is the most valuable to shield.
+$200,000
Typical asset location benefit
Cumulative after-tax gain on a $1M portfolio over 30 years, from simply holding the right investments in the right accounts. No change in allocation. No change in strategy.

A typical client with a 60/40 allocation across taxable, traditional, and Roth accounts has the equity weighted heavily in taxable and Roth, and the bond exposure weighted heavily in traditional. The allocation looks the same on paper. The after-tax outcome is materially better.

What this asks of you

None of these moves require special access. None of them is a tax shelter or an exotic structure. What they require is the willingness to think about taxes during the year they can still be influenced, not the year they are due. Roth conversions are decided in November and December. Tax-loss harvesting works year-round. Asset location is a structural decision that should be revisited any time allocations change.

The clients who do this well are not lucky. They are not in some special tax bracket the rest of the world is not in. They are simply working with people who think about this for a living, and who are looking twelve months ahead rather than at last year’s return.

If your tax conversation this year was a thirty minute review of what already happened, there is more available to you. The work that produces the outcomes happens before April, not during it.

WFG Wealth Management and LPL Financial do not provide tax or legal advice. Please consult your tax professional regarding the specifics of your situation.

Share this piece
Begin the conversation

What does money mean to you?

Every engagement starts with that question and a complimentary review. No pitch, no pressure. Just a conversation about your life, your goals, and what comes next.

Book a Meeting Call (410) 777-5897